about the end of WARLIKOWSKI IN DIALOGUE
in March dialogue, devoted to the topic of death, the two texts by the end Warlikowski. they fit perfectly into the trend of talking about this show. and this is a trend Disclosing awkwardness ( text Moravian and Olkusz but also Koscielniak or bagpipes) and the lack of substantive preparations ( Sieradz text but also Baniewicz ) critics. Warlikowski presentation is not easy to read. ranlinks before they saw, learned (s) pollonia READ program and end all (?) texts, which Gruszczynski Warlikowski and mingle in the scenario. how to understand ranglinks, should do the same critic. that did not pan Sieradz, hence the text is painted in the simplification (because how else to name the lack of any mental effort in the analysis of a fragment of Coetzee), ignorance (really Mr Jack, you do not know what became enthralled with the director in part by elisabeth Costello, tell ranglinks : not about cloves, come on, they also play their roles), with errors of interpretation (ranglinks wonders who is the first of the writing about the end of the fall on it, why so lazy it a distinctive way, for you Sieradz, like a heron). interesting and encouraging is the text morawskiekgo Olkusz. the end of the treats he pretekstowo. Juggling is a more thematic quotations from literature (this subject is death, password to the March number) than the critical say about the show.
0 comments:
Post a Comment