discloses PLOT THIS TEXT AND FILM Inception IMPORTANT MOMENTS, YOU CLEAN IT BEFORE seeing FILM. Inception is fast fun for someone without thinking, but for most it is a source of interesting theories and possible interpretations. The possible meanings is enough, everyone believes in something, but the arguments fly from one side to another. It is true somewhere out there, respectively. it is really true or is intended to find just the very thought and doubt caused by a work of art (film)? The Internet has begun to discover an awful lot of ideas and theories that inundate forums of all kinds (maybe fishermen already talking about fish in the Inception, which brings me to the question of where the game ?:-)). Personally, those are broken down by myself and gradually invaded the conjecture (with errors) to the end ...
conclusion is ...
A: reality. There are more options at the end because reality does not mean that we are conscious all the time walking between dream and reality. After seeing the movie, I doubt the end of the reality, but various lines of progressive thinking and meanings ( Ariadne, the relationship of the Cobb-Mall as the first visit to "limbo", itself a totem ...) brings doubt into an otherwise "simple" line. The perception of the film as "truthful" monitor insertion dream, the author tells the viewer everything honestly and in no way deceive them with respect Nolan on quality rather naive, but most viewers will probably end up with her.
Imagine that the entire movie is indeed a reality and everything is so "simple" as it seems. What then is the last scene in which Cobb spinning totem pole and leave the children? Before falling totem pole is the scene concluded and earned headlines. (Although I personally think that totem of the reality of turning = to drop the dream = constant rotation is tremendously different and it definitely shows the reality of change, so ...) What happens to a viewer? Nolan insert this image into the mind of the audience a simple idea and it questions the whole vyzněním film (and also took another step in the psychology of Cobb's character that has made the leap from their fear of the reality / dream). An easy way of handling that can be foreseen, but it shows the incredible power of simplicity and image filling artistic intention (= inspire the idea). Leaving Cobb without knowing the outcome of spin, however, is pure serenity in the spirit of reconciliation, that's what he wanted (and it does not matter if it's a dream or reality, reached his). Even if all other arguments suggesting that the entire movie is just a dream, go enter in any way under the table, this will always be there and back in spirit to suggest that things may not be as easy as it seems at first sight ...
"Who Would Want to Stay in a dream That long?" "Depends on the dream."
B Dream. What is it all a dream and we'll at all to reality? On the Internet you can find about 5 different options, but I stuck to the ground. Inception for understanding as the film taking place in the dream reality and not reality itself is probably the best kind of views. The viewer then sees all the dialogues, especially Mai, in another context (knowledge of one another allows visitors focus on the perception of continuity, but also details such as the ring:)) and rather suggest. Inception understood the dream as a multi-level, we get completely different than the meaning reality. Cobb, probably as a creator of her own dream, which has ceased to perceive the difference between dreams and reality, is haunted by his own guilt (conscience) of the death of his wife. Its persecution he just having fun, no viewer will see a confirmation of his beliefs (in addition to Mombasa?). The event, due to which it is forced to put together a team of helpers and go into the mind of Fischer, is the deeper way to fanciful world of him at the end is the insertion of ideas. But where? Fischer and his safe deposit box is not necessarily the main point, but only a means of fault destroyed Cobb returns to the "world", where he lived with Mal and end his suffering. You'll notice Ariadne, which, in the style of the mythical, Cobb led the whole maze of Dreams (!) To the target. It works almost like a therapist, the Cobb inwardly from the first time recognizes and believes it (eg the scene with the confidence of the truth about Cobbových ability to intervene in Fischer's dream ... but then again, what if it's all just another layer of Cobb subconscious, then it would influence had a clear basis). The fact that everything is in Cobb mind would explain much, but many are also complicated. My fundamental question is how Cobb would have to create a perfect and functional characters such as Arthur, Eames and Others? How could it happen that Arthur does not provide information about Fischer's security guard (there would be said that Cobb's subconscious is somehow protected, that it can not get deeper) when in fact Arthur Cobb, linking this to the same knowledge, even though he is unaware ? Issues will be more ...
quite important implications also acquires Waste Land or Limbo. The film is told it's "last "(??!) level in a dream in which you fall, you die in the upper layers. But Cobb was in his thoughts back to the period when you had built its own world. They talk about how they got what the deepest (or something to that effect), but they were asleep? Later we learn that from Limbe road leads to higher levels through death by Cobb to undergo Mal on the track (hence the symbol of a train passing through the entire film). But death in limbo will not send you back to reality, but only to a higher level, so Mal and the Cobb woke up in level and should still be shot in the head totem Cobb concluded that there (ALE! Fischer has a safe "for the idea" in the third layer of Dreams (Snow Fortress), so how could he have Mal in limbo? So if not safe in any deeper layer ..). It is essential in a film that, as literally and logically, we can understand the various explanations of the characters. Take such a totem-> must be the really, for what his character issue? What if it's just a reflection of Cobb's state of mind, his satisfaction with the reality and calm? Then he would not sign a totem reality / dream But Cobb's consciousness, which would be a dream could well understand:)
In each theory, the debater and various critics have offered are small holes that could not yet confirm any of them clearly, but that's good! After all of this carousel is doing Inception so unique, interesting and ambiguous. Classic spectator takes his "reality" and leave satisfied with a good film, the viewer is looking for more truth in a constant search for dialogue and the repetition of details and the latest the group will just swear that they missed something, for which a film is not automatically so stupid bullshit. robbery from the author's confession?
certainly not the only one who noticed the strong similarities between the director and character Nolan Cobb. Whether it's a visual similarity between DiCaprio and Nolan, or the way the film itself. When "good" characters as symbolic Saito = rich film company and Cobb = director or better yet the creator of dreams (films, which revolve in the dream factory of Hollywood ;-) =) to get to the meaning lines of the creative process, accountability and pressure on individuals and their status as a symbol of a dream built, which is not always successful / confident. This possibility, I did not look too far ...
What to Look For?
Take Cobb, who said Ariadne, it does not create a place that knows the real (and yet she creates a bridge that appears to Cobb Mall, coincidence?). When sitting at the coffee talking about dreams and our perception without "beginning." We know where we are, but we do not know but not not think about how we got here. In this style quite often Nolan cut scenes. The train to the hotel, from Tokyo to Paris, from Paris to Mombasa ... You do not know how, but you're there. Yes, this can work and classic film "speech" because the creator does not want to deal with transitions and pathways, but what if it's all a formal plan? And this is just a 3 minutes movie, which tells a couple of major things.
train appears three times-> Ariadne see him in dreams Cobb (lift), then on the street, where nobody can overlook it and then fall in behind the car off a bridge :)
Edith Piaf-> not only sings, "No, I do not regret anything," which has all the risers properly synchronized, but Marion Cottilard (Mal) at home an Oscar for his role as the famous French singer. UPDATE: Someone figured this . Amazing, is not it?
Reflections-> from the first scenes in a house across Saitově Ariadne glass door (where the camera? Morfeovy glasses shy:))) to the reflection in the memories of real people (children, had ,...).
Paradoxes-> steps are only a paradox, which speaks about Arthur?
Poster -> just a joke marketing department :-)
Ring -> roams the Internet an interesting theory, in which everything is a dream, where the Cobb marital ring. Everything else is just a reality ... interesting detail:)
Links to various theories of what is rolled out to the Internet (EN)
1 2 3 One ring to rule them all and (GB) discussion
What do the theories and possibilities of interpretation Inception?
PS: there is still comics, which acts as a prologue to the film and explains a little of what Cobb was looking at Saitově mind.
0 comments:
Post a Comment